Dear Mr - or Ms - Editor Person of Kerrang! Magazine
I just wanted to say how much I love - D - your magazine.
Note the D? Well, that was there because I've noticed that your reviews of MSI at Reading and ULU seemed to be conspicuous in their lack of attempt at seeing things from MSI's POV.
Yes, they're lowbrow. Yes, they insult the fans. Yes, their shows aren't ALL about the music... but surely their performance must have had something to do with the music. Why else would you review and interview them in a MUSIC magazine (Or at least, you claim it's music).
WHo's to say that Motley Crue, Judas Priest or My Chemical Romance are any more 'highbrow' than MSI?
Lyn-Z married Gerard. So what?! They're obviously very happy with each other and allow each other to do their own thing... so why victimise her when you know full well that being seen as nothing more than the wife of a famous lead singer from another band is exactly what she - as well as the MSI fans, including myself - DOESN'T WANT?!
Then again, she seems to be the only one you show posters of, so it's obvious that you're just jealous of her. The interviews with Jimmy and Lyn-Z asking them what songs changed their life DON'T count, as journalist opinion doesn't - thankfully in both cases!! - come into play there.
Music journalism should be about what the music is like; good or bad, everyone is entitled to their opinions on that. What they SHOULDN'T be entitled to is opinions of the fans... and especially not when they judge the fans purely because they're different to the average metal fan walking down the street and because they like a band that's like nothing else out there.
Although I'm a pretty late fan of MSI (discovering them in 2006), they've shaped my life in so many positive ways you couldn't imagine.
I've learnt to be more sociable and travel more independently - I have Asperger's Syndrome, which technically means I should be socially retarded, take everything literally and not have any empathy for others - and met some fantastic people thanks to them. Discovering MSI has brought me out of my shell, helped me realise who I am better and become a better person.
Their values, attitudes and music have me understand not to take things seriously, empathise with people more (famous ones included!!).
I dare you to name me any single other band that stays after the show and talks WILLINGLY to fans for over an hour after each show; and encourages all fans to be respectful and tolerant of each other regardless of race, sexuality, age, gender, disability, religion or political view!).
I even sang a karaoke song on holiday that I'd NEVER normally sing. Do you want to know why? Jimmy and Chantal have that song as their theme song for their radio show. It was actually thinking of them that got me on that stage in the first place!
In fact, give the Best Bar Mitzvah Ever a go and you'll see what amazing people James and Chantal are. Their advice is top notch, they make a huge effort to reply to everything they get, they have a wonderful sense of humour and obviously love and care about each other deeply.
I actually know somebody who was living in a warehouse and wrote in to them. They suggested that he help the family out any way he could and now he has a job doing what he wants to do and is very much alive and well.
Now if that's not saying that Jimmy is a positive role model.... I want you to tell me what is!!
Check their videos out here:
The most recent 'block' of Best Bar Mitzvah Ever [not putting links up in THIS context, but will do in the email
Funny stuff from them
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjPoABypl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIZZgKAfm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHmzEb75X
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drObvhysO
The first block on Youtube [not putting links up in THIS context, but will do in the email]
I'd been thinking for a very long time of boycotting your magazine and radio station, as well as anything else you're involved with - charitable or otherwise - and seeing those reviews of MSI at Reading at Leads has been the straw that broke the camel's back.
I know you won't print this as you seem determined to only print the bad things pople say about MSI, but I hope you read this and realise how unprofessional your so-called 'journalism' is.
Anyway, regardless of whether you print this or not, I hope you lose plenty more readers where this one came from
Love
Emma Selwyn
Liverpool
P.S. If you have any questions at all - of any kind - feel free to email me.How does this letter to Kerrang! about Mindless Self Indulgence sound grammatically OK to you? Proofread plz?
That's a good letter; it's really articulate and gets your point across really well. I agree with the other people that it may not be printed, however as long as the editor, or whoever it is, reads it, at least they will comprehend the influence that their writing has on readers.
Good job ;)
%26lt;3
p.s. I LOVE MSIHow does this letter to Kerrang! about Mindless Self Indulgence sound grammatically OK to you? Proofread plz?
They won't print that it's way too long.
Also, MSI really were AWFUL at Leeds fest.
Nice one for trying to make a stand though. How does this letter to Kerrang! about Mindless Self Indulgence sound grammatically OK to you? Proofread plz?
I agree with above, it's way too long for them to print.. You write well tho x
Thursday, June 2, 2011
WWE Smackdown! vs Raw 2010 Talk?
WOO! They updated the royal rumble match, he actually gets thrown over.
www.youtube.com/user/svrultimate
watch his vids for more info and we'll discuss the new features-
HUD feature-Great idea, but when i'm watching the vids on YT i don't see how he gets a finisher sometimes. I guess i have to pay closer attention.
Royal Rumble New Throwout-Finally! DOR1/2 you had to Kick them off the bottom rope, that was good. then no DoR3 (day of reckoning) and a crappy SvR on Wii. Although with other SvR button mashing was ****, cos as a player you couldn't get back in. Babies can button mash.
Graphics-Now i'm gonna let you finish, but William Regal,HBK,Jesse (looks like Duece Bigalow) have some of the worst facial graphics (and big show's beard lol) HBK just doesn't look right =/. hopefully in game it'll be better. Kane's shoulders aren't broad and muscular-FINALLY.
Cena looks like an idiot.
CA-Storyline: Awesome :D it could be time consuming though :(. i heard, you can make (somebody) change what they are default going to say with the pop up keyboard, or with some consoles actually plug IN a keyboard and type (sweet). Like i said, you could spend AGES on a single storyline and still have to wrestle should you put yourself in, though you could make a card entirely matches-no cutscenes, vice versa. although you get ratings/grades on your Show/PPV like Crowd Excitement etc.
Superstar Threads: Sweet, Rey will be totally altered, but i hear something to do with up to 3 superstar (something something superstar thread) please elaborate if you know. i just read, you can actually change gear, possible to give Y2J his old pants etc, triple h his shorts etc.(that'd be good, alot like DoR2 %26quot;customize%26quot; a current wrestler moves etc)
CAW- WOOT you can change the skin colour, hopefully by actually Picking it. I advise if you have a wii, find/borrow/buy Day of reckoning 2, it has a Fantastic CAW. skin colours, awesome CAE, great effects. it's awesome, i think CAW could be like/better. i can make my classic, signature caw of Ghoul :D.
CAE- i hope you get more than 2 pyro.. in DOR1 and DOR2 you could get pyro for every stage of entrance.
Collision-So long have we watched as a submission is placed, not actually touching the head or arm. A punch, that hits the air or turnbuckles. They have a new game engine, Havok, it improves collision (HHH/Jimmy Falon clip) the jumping knee looks like it really hit his chin. Good Job.
Nintendo- wow, good work. DS has 14 backstage areas to fight in and a somewhat new fight scheme, you might be able to go out of the ring apparently, and the Wii %26quot;could be more comparable to the other stations%26quot; I know there is- Vince's Office, Dirt Sheet, Locker Room, Car Park (off the top of my head) i hope each area has unique things (dirt sheet, throw through Hollywood, vinces office, place on vince desk, climb/pull down the bookself and jump off (if you climb) or table falls on the desk with the wrestler etc).
(sorry for spelling mistakes, it's been raining for AGES and i'm cold as)
RTWM: CAW rtwm will be sweet. i hope it isn't like the basic CAW storyline in previous games, something interesting and mysterious (like Y2J rtwm with the masked man, i got Orton, what'd you guys get for your masked man?) Also, a diva's line sweet :P mickie james... sour.
DLC- You can now Upload created superstars :D aswell as basic dlc,there are what you've made as: Entrances, highlight reels (best moments of your shows/matches/ppv's), finishing moves etc to DLC :P
Any more updates you know of?
be sure to post and elaborate here :DWWE Smackdown! vs Raw 2010 Talk?
sweet this game will be awesomeWWE Smackdown! vs Raw 2010 Talk?
Okay this is all good to know but this is not a question?WWE Smackdown! vs Raw 2010 Talk?
You're a Cu** no one cares
www.youtube.com/user/svrultimate
watch his vids for more info and we'll discuss the new features-
HUD feature-Great idea, but when i'm watching the vids on YT i don't see how he gets a finisher sometimes. I guess i have to pay closer attention.
Royal Rumble New Throwout-Finally! DOR1/2 you had to Kick them off the bottom rope, that was good. then no DoR3 (day of reckoning) and a crappy SvR on Wii. Although with other SvR button mashing was ****, cos as a player you couldn't get back in. Babies can button mash.
Graphics-Now i'm gonna let you finish, but William Regal,HBK,Jesse (looks like Duece Bigalow) have some of the worst facial graphics (and big show's beard lol) HBK just doesn't look right =/. hopefully in game it'll be better. Kane's shoulders aren't broad and muscular-FINALLY.
Cena looks like an idiot.
CA-Storyline: Awesome :D it could be time consuming though :(. i heard, you can make (somebody) change what they are default going to say with the pop up keyboard, or with some consoles actually plug IN a keyboard and type (sweet). Like i said, you could spend AGES on a single storyline and still have to wrestle should you put yourself in, though you could make a card entirely matches-no cutscenes, vice versa. although you get ratings/grades on your Show/PPV like Crowd Excitement etc.
Superstar Threads: Sweet, Rey will be totally altered, but i hear something to do with up to 3 superstar (something something superstar thread) please elaborate if you know. i just read, you can actually change gear, possible to give Y2J his old pants etc, triple h his shorts etc.(that'd be good, alot like DoR2 %26quot;customize%26quot; a current wrestler moves etc)
CAW- WOOT you can change the skin colour, hopefully by actually Picking it. I advise if you have a wii, find/borrow/buy Day of reckoning 2, it has a Fantastic CAW. skin colours, awesome CAE, great effects. it's awesome, i think CAW could be like/better. i can make my classic, signature caw of Ghoul :D.
CAE- i hope you get more than 2 pyro.. in DOR1 and DOR2 you could get pyro for every stage of entrance.
Collision-So long have we watched as a submission is placed, not actually touching the head or arm. A punch, that hits the air or turnbuckles. They have a new game engine, Havok, it improves collision (HHH/Jimmy Falon clip) the jumping knee looks like it really hit his chin. Good Job.
Nintendo- wow, good work. DS has 14 backstage areas to fight in and a somewhat new fight scheme, you might be able to go out of the ring apparently, and the Wii %26quot;could be more comparable to the other stations%26quot; I know there is- Vince's Office, Dirt Sheet, Locker Room, Car Park (off the top of my head) i hope each area has unique things (dirt sheet, throw through Hollywood, vinces office, place on vince desk, climb/pull down the bookself and jump off (if you climb) or table falls on the desk with the wrestler etc).
(sorry for spelling mistakes, it's been raining for AGES and i'm cold as)
RTWM: CAW rtwm will be sweet. i hope it isn't like the basic CAW storyline in previous games, something interesting and mysterious (like Y2J rtwm with the masked man, i got Orton, what'd you guys get for your masked man?) Also, a diva's line sweet :P mickie james... sour.
DLC- You can now Upload created superstars :D aswell as basic dlc,there are what you've made as: Entrances, highlight reels (best moments of your shows/matches/ppv's), finishing moves etc to DLC :P
Any more updates you know of?
be sure to post and elaborate here :DWWE Smackdown! vs Raw 2010 Talk?
sweet this game will be awesomeWWE Smackdown! vs Raw 2010 Talk?
Okay this is all good to know but this is not a question?WWE Smackdown! vs Raw 2010 Talk?
You're a Cu** no one cares
My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody video of Adina Howard's "Freak Like Me"...?
Hi guys,
I'm in college and my cousin who is in high school wants to make a parody video about how extreme teen female sexuality has become nowadays and especially since the consent age is 16.
So she's planning to make a parody music video of Adina Howard's %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot; (1995) which if you don't know is a hypersexual music video:
See on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmW3lh7Npzg
Um... yeah... That would be too uncomfortable to me and that is jailbait material!! LOL She says its time to confront society to see how sexual teenagers can really be with society allowing consent at 16 years old and how hypocritical society is about blasting female teen singers becoming more sexy like Miley Cyrus and Britney Spears (back in 1999) when those same critical people lost their virginity around the same age.
So what do you think? Tell me your age and opinion so I''ll know what age you are coming from.
By the way, my cousin isn't slutty or promiscious...she's wants to cast a mirror to what society sees as objectionable but society permits it their private lives.
She's also sending this to a local music video competition as a form of sarcasm about how hypocritical society is. Her implied statement would be, %26quot;You think this is objectionable? LOL, are you forgetting I'm 16, it's legal, and this is what you adults were doing to? LOL%26quot;
She's even changing the lyrics in the song to this:
%26quot;Let me lay it on the line have a little freakness inside,
And you know being a teen has to do with it
I don't care what they say
I'm not about to pay nobody's way
'Cause you know that we have consent mm-hmm%26quot;
%26quot;I want to freak in the morning
A freak in the evening just like me
I need a horndog that can satisfy me...just for me
If you are 16, cause I'm 16 too..
It ain't a freaky secret, everybody teen sing...
Cause we have legal consent...%26quot;
Yeah... (rolls eyes)....That's some of the lyrics she's putting in there...
So what do you guys think?My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
Lol. If that's what she wants, then I say let her. But to be honest, I don't find it attractive when girls are extremely sexual like that. I find it slightly humorous, actually.
And I'm a 14 year old male, by the way.My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
that is one way to get a little notoriety and attention.
It is not likely to teach anybody any moral values.My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
yesgames favorite baby names
I'm in college and my cousin who is in high school wants to make a parody video about how extreme teen female sexuality has become nowadays and especially since the consent age is 16.
So she's planning to make a parody music video of Adina Howard's %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot; (1995) which if you don't know is a hypersexual music video:
See on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmW3lh7Npzg
Um... yeah... That would be too uncomfortable to me and that is jailbait material!! LOL She says its time to confront society to see how sexual teenagers can really be with society allowing consent at 16 years old and how hypocritical society is about blasting female teen singers becoming more sexy like Miley Cyrus and Britney Spears (back in 1999) when those same critical people lost their virginity around the same age.
So what do you think? Tell me your age and opinion so I''ll know what age you are coming from.
By the way, my cousin isn't slutty or promiscious...she's wants to cast a mirror to what society sees as objectionable but society permits it their private lives.
She's also sending this to a local music video competition as a form of sarcasm about how hypocritical society is. Her implied statement would be, %26quot;You think this is objectionable? LOL, are you forgetting I'm 16, it's legal, and this is what you adults were doing to? LOL%26quot;
She's even changing the lyrics in the song to this:
%26quot;Let me lay it on the line have a little freakness inside,
And you know being a teen has to do with it
I don't care what they say
I'm not about to pay nobody's way
'Cause you know that we have consent mm-hmm%26quot;
%26quot;I want to freak in the morning
A freak in the evening just like me
I need a horndog that can satisfy me...just for me
If you are 16, cause I'm 16 too..
It ain't a freaky secret, everybody teen sing...
Cause we have legal consent...%26quot;
Yeah... (rolls eyes)....That's some of the lyrics she's putting in there...
So what do you guys think?My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
Lol. If that's what she wants, then I say let her. But to be honest, I don't find it attractive when girls are extremely sexual like that. I find it slightly humorous, actually.
And I'm a 14 year old male, by the way.My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
that is one way to get a little notoriety and attention.
It is not likely to teach anybody any moral values.My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
yes
Carbon dating supports evolution?
If you would like to debate go to my youtube channel http://www.youtube.com/thejesusfreak919
or email me: claydubberly@yahoo.com
Not at all. Most laymen are under the mistaken impression that carbon dating is used to show that the earth is millions or billions of years old. This is not the case at all. Carbon dating always gives ages much less than this, even on things that are allegedly millions or billions of years old. The reason is that the C-14 isotope is short-lived. Here's how it works:
Most carbon is a stable variety called C-12, but a small fraction of carbon is C-14, which is unstable. Unstable means that C-14 is constantly decaying -- it is continually and spontaneously changing into nitrogen. This happens slowly, one atom at a time. The rate is such that in 5,736 years, half of the C-14 will have decayed into nitrogen. After another 5.736 years, half of the remaining amount will have decayed, leaving only one-fourth of the original, and so on. So by making certain assumptions and then measuring the amount of C-14 in an ancient sample, scientists are able to make an estimate of the age. Since C-14 decays fairly rapidly (at least compared to the secular alleged age of the earth), it would decay to an undetectable amount after 100,000 years. In fact, if the entire mass of the earth were C-14, after one million years not even one atom would be left! So it may come as a shock to you to learn that C-14 has been found in allegedly very ancient substances, such as coal and diamonds -- coal supposedly formed millions of years ago, in the evolutionary worldview. And the diamonds in which C-14 has been found are supposed to be over a billion years old in the secular view! The presence of detectable C-14 indicates that the true age of these things is only a few thousand years. Carbon dating certainly challenges the billions-of-years view.Carbon dating supports evolution?
I'll respond to your question to the extend of addressing your question here, and only here as to the science in your argument. I see no debatable resolution in the evolution vs creation squabble but bad science needs to be corrected when scientific understanding is misrepresented.
%26quot;Carbon dating%26quot; neither supports nor defends evolution theory. It disproves a %26quot;young earth%26quot; however.
Your discussion was good right up to the point you assert that no C14 could exist after 1,000,000 years . C14 is constantly being made at the top of the atmosphere. But for arguments sake, if you assume Earth to be a closed system, some C14 sill remains after n+ sigmas. Statistically even after 99.99999...nth% decays over almost 800,000 half lives, there remains the probability that some C14 atoms survive . No one can %26quot;prove%26quot; that some original C14 from the protosolar system or the star previous to our sun does not now exist somewhere in the solar system. In C14 dating we are not counting every C14 atom-- only the number of disintegrations during the count interval. It is more plausible that there is another source for C14 formation than just at the top of the atmosphere. In fact it is an ongoing process in meteoroids traveling in space. More on this process later.
%26quot;Half life%26quot; is a measured, consistent, average rate of disintegrations based on statistics. Nothing about %26quot;half-life%26quot; mandates a particular atom to disintegrate at a particular moment or by a particular date. The C14 isotope is biased to disintegrate, yes, but it too goes through an unknown %26quot;probability%26quot; event awaiting the conditions which trigger a decay. If %26quot;lucky%26quot; it may never disintegrate. %26quot;Half life%26quot; rates break down under extremely small samples--it is a statistical construct. This is one of the reasons C14 dating is not reliable past 60,000 years although new techniques may push that to 100-120 thousand in some circumstances. However, when measured within a statistical framework of many %26quot;samples%26quot;, C14 it is a reliable tool for the range it has been validated for. That is dating once living particles that absorbed C14 while living.
You mention C14 in %26quot;coal and diamonds%26quot;, what is your source that C14 is found in coal and diamonds and what is the concentration of C14? What is your proof that the C14 is not an artifact of an alternate genesis other than the sun or from contamination?
Fortunately we don't need biogenic processes to account for C14 in in coal or diamonds. Isn't it disingenuous to throw up a strawman that deliberately fashioned to leave out parts of the truth so he seems more vulnerable? Isn't there something in the bible about thou shalt not bear false witness?
I happen to know already so to save you from having to research it. Terrestrial diamonds do not uptake C14 through a biogenic process ,so they are outside the dating argument already. They do have trace C14 so it has to come from an alternate process such as neutron absorption by a C13 atom.
One uranium decay can supply two C13s with a neutron each. Coal and oil shales are relatively enriched in uranium. C14 in these cases, are detected by mass spectroscopy not by counting decays. So, amounts much smaller than are usable for radiometric dating can be detected. Stating there is C14 in coal is a red herring given that you failed to also introduce the other processes which can produce C14. Actually it is well known that fossil fuels contain something under 1% of the amount of C14 found even in a 40,000yr old sample.
I will give you some kudos even if your argument has some flaws. You are at least not trying to rehash the typical, run-of-the-mill, defective strawman to knock down and claim %26quot;victory%26quot; over science--but it is still a intentionally crippled strawman, none-the-less.
So I have to disagree with your conclusion. Carbon dating doesn't challenge a 4.55卤 billion year old earth! The challenge here is to not let psuedo-scientific rationale pollute scientific knowledge through introducing faulty logic and arguments which address all the facts.
As to your link, I am sure you are sincere and that you are well spoken. However, your assertion the the Bible is %26quot;Gods Word alone and given by God as the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth%26quot;(my words)--that too has pretty much been debunked by bible scholars. But there is a section in Yahoo Answers for debating the merits and this is not it.Carbon dating supports evolution?
You make a common mistake by those without training in using the scientific method. One observation is not enough to overturn an idea that has supporting evidence from a multitude of experiments from diverse areas of research. Incredible claims require incredible evidence and this observation of C14 in diamonds doesn't even rate as evidence, it is systematic error in experimental design.
Scientists do not do experiments and stop when they get the answer they want; they also have to test to rule out all other possible models that could explain their results. This is a case of not doing the experiment properly.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/originCarbon dating supports evolution?
%26gt; %26quot;Carbon dating supports evolution?%26quot;
Carbon dating is useful in archaeology, but not in paleontology.
Firstly, fossils no longer contain any carbon - it has been replaced by mineralis in the fossilisation process.
And secondly, fossils are all far too old for C14 dating to be used - since it can only accurately date objects to %26lt;60,000 years old.
Other radioisotopes, such as potassium/argon and uranium/lead are used to date older rocks and fossils.
The presence of C14 in diamond, etc. may be unusual - but we know that rocks grow increasingly radioactive the deeper you go - and diamond mines are very deep indeed. Diamonds are only formed deep in the crust - and it is perfectly possible that interaction with other radioisotopes form C14 down there (it is, after all, bombardment of CO2 in the upprt atmosphere which forms C14 under normal circumstances). I'm no geologist - but such mechanisms do not seem unreasonable to me.
PS - the way half-lives work does not mean that there would be no more C14, even if the entire earth were made of it, over 3.8 billion years. In fact, we should *always* expect there to still be some C14: the amount recedes towards zero in a logarithmic progression, but it will never reach it.Carbon dating supports evolution?
I find some of the answers interesting. I find it interesting too that living tissue has been dated as being 40,00 years old - the oldest living creature on earth? I think not!
or email me: claydubberly@yahoo.com
Not at all. Most laymen are under the mistaken impression that carbon dating is used to show that the earth is millions or billions of years old. This is not the case at all. Carbon dating always gives ages much less than this, even on things that are allegedly millions or billions of years old. The reason is that the C-14 isotope is short-lived. Here's how it works:
Most carbon is a stable variety called C-12, but a small fraction of carbon is C-14, which is unstable. Unstable means that C-14 is constantly decaying -- it is continually and spontaneously changing into nitrogen. This happens slowly, one atom at a time. The rate is such that in 5,736 years, half of the C-14 will have decayed into nitrogen. After another 5.736 years, half of the remaining amount will have decayed, leaving only one-fourth of the original, and so on. So by making certain assumptions and then measuring the amount of C-14 in an ancient sample, scientists are able to make an estimate of the age. Since C-14 decays fairly rapidly (at least compared to the secular alleged age of the earth), it would decay to an undetectable amount after 100,000 years. In fact, if the entire mass of the earth were C-14, after one million years not even one atom would be left! So it may come as a shock to you to learn that C-14 has been found in allegedly very ancient substances, such as coal and diamonds -- coal supposedly formed millions of years ago, in the evolutionary worldview. And the diamonds in which C-14 has been found are supposed to be over a billion years old in the secular view! The presence of detectable C-14 indicates that the true age of these things is only a few thousand years. Carbon dating certainly challenges the billions-of-years view.Carbon dating supports evolution?
I'll respond to your question to the extend of addressing your question here, and only here as to the science in your argument. I see no debatable resolution in the evolution vs creation squabble but bad science needs to be corrected when scientific understanding is misrepresented.
%26quot;Carbon dating%26quot; neither supports nor defends evolution theory. It disproves a %26quot;young earth%26quot; however.
Your discussion was good right up to the point you assert that no C14 could exist after 1,000,000 years . C14 is constantly being made at the top of the atmosphere. But for arguments sake, if you assume Earth to be a closed system, some C14 sill remains after n+ sigmas. Statistically even after 99.99999...nth% decays over almost 800,000 half lives, there remains the probability that some C14 atoms survive . No one can %26quot;prove%26quot; that some original C14 from the protosolar system or the star previous to our sun does not now exist somewhere in the solar system. In C14 dating we are not counting every C14 atom-- only the number of disintegrations during the count interval. It is more plausible that there is another source for C14 formation than just at the top of the atmosphere. In fact it is an ongoing process in meteoroids traveling in space. More on this process later.
%26quot;Half life%26quot; is a measured, consistent, average rate of disintegrations based on statistics. Nothing about %26quot;half-life%26quot; mandates a particular atom to disintegrate at a particular moment or by a particular date. The C14 isotope is biased to disintegrate, yes, but it too goes through an unknown %26quot;probability%26quot; event awaiting the conditions which trigger a decay. If %26quot;lucky%26quot; it may never disintegrate. %26quot;Half life%26quot; rates break down under extremely small samples--it is a statistical construct. This is one of the reasons C14 dating is not reliable past 60,000 years although new techniques may push that to 100-120 thousand in some circumstances. However, when measured within a statistical framework of many %26quot;samples%26quot;, C14 it is a reliable tool for the range it has been validated for. That is dating once living particles that absorbed C14 while living.
You mention C14 in %26quot;coal and diamonds%26quot;, what is your source that C14 is found in coal and diamonds and what is the concentration of C14? What is your proof that the C14 is not an artifact of an alternate genesis other than the sun or from contamination?
Fortunately we don't need biogenic processes to account for C14 in in coal or diamonds. Isn't it disingenuous to throw up a strawman that deliberately fashioned to leave out parts of the truth so he seems more vulnerable? Isn't there something in the bible about thou shalt not bear false witness?
I happen to know already so to save you from having to research it. Terrestrial diamonds do not uptake C14 through a biogenic process ,so they are outside the dating argument already. They do have trace C14 so it has to come from an alternate process such as neutron absorption by a C13 atom.
One uranium decay can supply two C13s with a neutron each. Coal and oil shales are relatively enriched in uranium. C14 in these cases, are detected by mass spectroscopy not by counting decays. So, amounts much smaller than are usable for radiometric dating can be detected. Stating there is C14 in coal is a red herring given that you failed to also introduce the other processes which can produce C14. Actually it is well known that fossil fuels contain something under 1% of the amount of C14 found even in a 40,000yr old sample.
I will give you some kudos even if your argument has some flaws. You are at least not trying to rehash the typical, run-of-the-mill, defective strawman to knock down and claim %26quot;victory%26quot; over science--but it is still a intentionally crippled strawman, none-the-less.
So I have to disagree with your conclusion. Carbon dating doesn't challenge a 4.55卤 billion year old earth! The challenge here is to not let psuedo-scientific rationale pollute scientific knowledge through introducing faulty logic and arguments which address all the facts.
As to your link, I am sure you are sincere and that you are well spoken. However, your assertion the the Bible is %26quot;Gods Word alone and given by God as the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth%26quot;(my words)--that too has pretty much been debunked by bible scholars. But there is a section in Yahoo Answers for debating the merits and this is not it.Carbon dating supports evolution?
You make a common mistake by those without training in using the scientific method. One observation is not enough to overturn an idea that has supporting evidence from a multitude of experiments from diverse areas of research. Incredible claims require incredible evidence and this observation of C14 in diamonds doesn't even rate as evidence, it is systematic error in experimental design.
Scientists do not do experiments and stop when they get the answer they want; they also have to test to rule out all other possible models that could explain their results. This is a case of not doing the experiment properly.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/originCarbon dating supports evolution?
%26gt; %26quot;Carbon dating supports evolution?%26quot;
Carbon dating is useful in archaeology, but not in paleontology.
Firstly, fossils no longer contain any carbon - it has been replaced by mineralis in the fossilisation process.
And secondly, fossils are all far too old for C14 dating to be used - since it can only accurately date objects to %26lt;60,000 years old.
Other radioisotopes, such as potassium/argon and uranium/lead are used to date older rocks and fossils.
The presence of C14 in diamond, etc. may be unusual - but we know that rocks grow increasingly radioactive the deeper you go - and diamond mines are very deep indeed. Diamonds are only formed deep in the crust - and it is perfectly possible that interaction with other radioisotopes form C14 down there (it is, after all, bombardment of CO2 in the upprt atmosphere which forms C14 under normal circumstances). I'm no geologist - but such mechanisms do not seem unreasonable to me.
PS - the way half-lives work does not mean that there would be no more C14, even if the entire earth were made of it, over 3.8 billion years. In fact, we should *always* expect there to still be some C14: the amount recedes towards zero in a logarithmic progression, but it will never reach it.Carbon dating supports evolution?
I find some of the answers interesting. I find it interesting too that living tissue has been dated as being 40,00 years old - the oldest living creature on earth? I think not!
My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody music video of Adina Howard's "Freak Like Me"...?
Hi guys,
I'm in college and my cousin who is in high school wants to make a parody video about how extreme teen female sexuality has become nowadays and especially since the consent age is 16.
So she's planning to make a parody music video of Adina Howard's %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot; (1995) which if you don't know is a hypersexual music video:
See on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmW3lh7Npzg
Um... yeah... That would be too uncomfortable to me and that is jailbait material!! LOL She says its time to confront society to see how sexual teenagers can really be with society allowing consent at 16 years old and how hypocritical society is about blasting female teen singers becoming more sexy like Miley Cyrus and Britney Spears (back in 1999) when those same critical people lost their virginity around the same age.
So what do you think? Tell me your age and opinion so I''ll know what age you are coming from.
By the way, my cousin isn't slutty or promiscious...she's wants to cast a mirror to what society sees as objectionable but society permits it their private lives.
She's also sending this to a local music video competition as a form of sarcasm about how hypocritical society is. Her implied statement would be, %26quot;You think this is objectionable? LOL, are you forgetting I'm 16, it's legal, and this is what you adults were doing to? LOL%26quot;
She's even changing the lyrics in the song to this:
%26quot;Let me lay it on the line have a little freakness inside,
And you know being a teen has to do with it
I don't care what they say
I'm not about to pay nobody's way
'Cause you know that we have consent mm-hmm%26quot;
%26quot;I want to freak in the morning
A freak in the evening just like me
I need a horndog that can satisfy me...just for me
If you are 16, cause I'm 16 too..
It ain't a freaky secret, everybody teen sing...
Cause we have legal consent...%26quot;
Yeah... (rolls eyes)....That's some of the lyrics she's putting in there...
So what do you guys think?My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody music video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
There must be another way to deal with the problem, why would she lower herself to the very things she hate of society, I don't think that video is a good idea, some freak guy (or lesbian) from the web is gonna be happy to copy it and pass it over to other pervs.My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody music video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
The lyrics are quite hardcore but it's not too bad.
=)
I'm in college and my cousin who is in high school wants to make a parody video about how extreme teen female sexuality has become nowadays and especially since the consent age is 16.
So she's planning to make a parody music video of Adina Howard's %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot; (1995) which if you don't know is a hypersexual music video:
See on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmW3lh7Npzg
Um... yeah... That would be too uncomfortable to me and that is jailbait material!! LOL She says its time to confront society to see how sexual teenagers can really be with society allowing consent at 16 years old and how hypocritical society is about blasting female teen singers becoming more sexy like Miley Cyrus and Britney Spears (back in 1999) when those same critical people lost their virginity around the same age.
So what do you think? Tell me your age and opinion so I''ll know what age you are coming from.
By the way, my cousin isn't slutty or promiscious...she's wants to cast a mirror to what society sees as objectionable but society permits it their private lives.
She's also sending this to a local music video competition as a form of sarcasm about how hypocritical society is. Her implied statement would be, %26quot;You think this is objectionable? LOL, are you forgetting I'm 16, it's legal, and this is what you adults were doing to? LOL%26quot;
She's even changing the lyrics in the song to this:
%26quot;Let me lay it on the line have a little freakness inside,
And you know being a teen has to do with it
I don't care what they say
I'm not about to pay nobody's way
'Cause you know that we have consent mm-hmm%26quot;
%26quot;I want to freak in the morning
A freak in the evening just like me
I need a horndog that can satisfy me...just for me
If you are 16, cause I'm 16 too..
It ain't a freaky secret, everybody teen sing...
Cause we have legal consent...%26quot;
Yeah... (rolls eyes)....That's some of the lyrics she's putting in there...
So what do you guys think?My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody music video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
There must be another way to deal with the problem, why would she lower herself to the very things she hate of society, I don't think that video is a good idea, some freak guy (or lesbian) from the web is gonna be happy to copy it and pass it over to other pervs.My 16 year old cousin wants to make a parody music video of Adina Howard%26039;s %26quot;Freak Like Me%26quot;...?
The lyrics are quite hardcore but it's not too bad.
=)
Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Cos' if Cena turns heel then his younger fans might not want to buy his merchandise. Does Vince care more about his and Cena's royalties than Cena's fanbase?
John Cena - He could be so much better than he is at the minute, at the minute he comes out and does the nearly same thing every week and the marine gimmick is going stale now. Everyone is begging WWE to turn him back into the doctor of thuganomics/rapping gimmick because it suits him better and he got more of a crowd reaction than he does now. It appealed to a more mature fanbase, now this marine gimmick is attracting the majority of 12 year olds and under, whereas his previous even attracted the likes of 16 year olds.
John Cena is really nice outside of wrestling, cares for his fans and acts as a good role model for them.
Plus he's a face and he gets booed; that's just plain pathetic, the way it is meant to work is that the faces get cheered and the heels get booed. But it's working a whole different way in this situation. Although you can hear a hoard of cheers from the crowd, you can sometimes still slightly even hear the boos, hell in some cases with Cena you could easily hear the boos, like these events for instance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-PkYVxM_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2PhzeLeI
But to keep John Cena's respect intact which he kinda deserves, I have wrote this:
John Cena because he is fun, funny, charismatic, a good brawler and powerhouse and knows how to get a crowd hyped up.
For all John Cena haters I have found a way to debunk all of your comments:
You all say these about John Cena:
1. His title reign was far too long and he gets too many title shots: Triple H, The Rock and JBL's title reigns went on for ages and I don't hear you complain about them. They also get (Except The Rock) loads of title shots and you seem to leave those superstars out when you criticise Cena. And it isn't like every match he gets is a main event, contender or title match.
2. His moveset is boring, he has a limited no. of moves and uses the same ones nearly every single match: Hey have you seen the people who use really simple moves like just punches and simple grapples like Mark Henry and Big Daddy V. Their movesets are hardly amusing, at least Cena puts some effort into his moves. Yet you fail to abuse them like you do to Cena. Plus John Cena is sometimes a mid carder with the jbl feud. In addition it is partly the trainers fault regarding Cena's moveset.
3. His marine gimmick is crap: Changing his gimmick is good because it gives the fans something new, although his previous gimmick attracted more older fans and I prefer it, the wwe company partly told him how to do his gimmick.
In addition, how can you say that he gets the hell booed out of him when he has a hell of a lot of hype going and probably the most merchandise going.
Also his mic skills and charisma are outstanding, after all that is what wwe mostly about! More than wrestling abilty I think!
I think Cena has:
-strength
-charisma
-technical skill
-mic skill
-popularity
-overall skill
People just want him to turn heel because they think he has been a good guy for far too long and his heel character appeals to older fans whereas his new one mostly appeals to younger fans.
But I still like him as my favourite wrestler, even though I would love it if he changed to his thuganomics gimmick again since I think it was better, more interesting and it appealed to my age more.
But nonetheless, I think he is a fantastic wrestler.
So if WWE reading this; please turn John Cena heel and back into the doctor of thuganomics for the sake of his fanbase, popularity and respect.
Thank you very much.
Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Okay, I'm in no way a Cena hater, but I dislike him as a wrestler.
Vince cares about $$$ and nothing more. Cena would be respected more as a heel by older fans, but does Vince care? No. He knows that less kids will buy a heel superstars merchandise, and therefore is not going to turn him heel until there's a decline in productivity.
I know Cena is a good guy outside of wrestling, that's why I respect him as a person. It doesn't mean I like him as a wrestler.
And yes, he's not getting more boos. It's pretty obvious that if a lot of fully grown men are booing, and little kids are cheering, then the booing is going to be a lot more audible. People have a right to free opinions, and if this is their opinion then fair enough. You can't force people into liking a certain wrestler, they either do or they don't.
This is what I have to say about your comments.
1) His title reign was far too long and he gets too many title shots.
Okay I'll start with JBL. He is one of the most disliked guys in the WWE, everybody dislikes him and everyone deals with that. Because everyone knows that JBL is a jerk, they don't bother posting Q's saying so. Cena on the other hand, has a very split audience. Many love him, many hate him. That's where the controversy comes from.
HHH is a good wrestler and entertaining on the mic. Cena is entertaining on the mic but he can't wrestle to the standard of HHH. And you have to remember HHH's great history with the WWE; his days with DX and so on. That is why he never gets insulted.
The Rock is possibly the most hilarious guy to ever step between the ropes. He had decent wrestling skills, but what was really amazing was the fact that he could have the whole crowd in stitches with the stuff he said on the mic.
2) His moveset is boring, he has a limited no. of moves and uses the same ones nearly every single match.
In response to your comments regarding BDV and Mark Henry, could you please inform me of people who actually like either of these guys? The only reason people talk about them less is because they aren't constantly main eventing like Cena. Say hypothetically, that BDV was main-eventing Raw. People would go beserk!
3) His marine gimmick is crap.
Changing the gimmick CAN be good, but it isn't always for the better; there have been failed gimmicks previously in WWE and this is just a classic example. At the time of Cena being heel, I think fans were quite content with him. His gimmick change really made the respect for him lower.
He gets the hell booed out of him because he isn't an able wrestler. Merchandise means nothing in terms of skill. The majority of people who buy his stuff are 13 and under, and many of them don't know a great deal about wrestling.
Yes, his mic skills are very good there's no denying that. But being good on the mic does not cover up wrestling flaws, of which Cena has many.
-strength. Yes he does, but so does the majority of the WWE roster. It doesn't make them more able as wrestlers.
-charisma. Yes he is very charismatic. But again, this doesn't make him more able.
-technical skill. No he doesn't. HBK, Chris Jericho and John Morrison have technical skill. John Cena will never be able to chain wrestle, mat wrestle, or put in any decent submission holds. Those are qualities of a technical wrestler.
-mic skill - Yes he does.
-popularity - Disputed. He has popularity from a certain area of WWE supporters, but many others don't like him. So for overall popularity, no.
-overall skill - Honestly no. Overall skill would be him dipping in and out of different types of wrestling; technical, submission, powerhouse, etc. Cena is a brawler with a few powerhouse moves. And nothing more.
I'm not trying to change your opinions, I'm just trying to be the voice of the haters. I can see their reasoning for disliking him.Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
i believe so and cause he is popular as a face and i think if WWE was smart they would send him to FCW and let him get somemore training doneIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
ur right, what batista said on moner day about people the over the age of 15 would love to see batista kick cenas a**, (batista kinda sucks 2 though lol) ....
Cena's wwe charactor will allways be the one who ruined the wwe 4 ever! But i respect him out of the wweIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
That's they only reason he still a face Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
duh even like last monday they said only little kids buy his stuffIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
pretty muchIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
pretty much you covered your own question lol
but it is true he shoves him right in our face's but vince has a new goal
and that is little kids.
i wonder what happened to the vince that treated everyone like goldenIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Those same kids get their parents to take them to House Shows, Live events and Pay Per Views. WWE looks at them as paying customers, can you blame them? I don't get worked up over John Cena like many other people seem to on Yahoo Answers. As a Wrestler, I can probably name several hundred wrestlers in ROH, FIP, AAA, CMLL, NJPW, PWH, Dragons Gate and other wrestling promotions who have more wrestling holds and moves. He cannot compare for example to Kenta, Brian Danielson, Nigel McGuinness, AJ Styles and Christopher Daniels. If all those older fans are going to go to House Shows, Live Events, Pay Per Views and buy John Cena Merchandise in the same quantities as the kids do, then maybe they will change his character. His Character being the way he is has gotten him commercials and endorsements. If you don't like him, who is to say you have to. This is a free country.Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
yer i think he is good face for the kids, but i think he would lose on sunday.Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
This money is and always will run by MONEY
Ofcourse Cena is being sold properly
He wont be turnin heel for a while
Vince wants the $MONEY$Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Cena's loved by both women and childrenIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Yes! He sucks as a wrestler but he brings in the most money from merchandise so they keep him at the top. So this keeps people with good wrestling skills such as William Regal, Shelton Benjamin, Matt Hardy and Paul Burchill at the Low to Mid Card
John Cena - He could be so much better than he is at the minute, at the minute he comes out and does the nearly same thing every week and the marine gimmick is going stale now. Everyone is begging WWE to turn him back into the doctor of thuganomics/rapping gimmick because it suits him better and he got more of a crowd reaction than he does now. It appealed to a more mature fanbase, now this marine gimmick is attracting the majority of 12 year olds and under, whereas his previous even attracted the likes of 16 year olds.
John Cena is really nice outside of wrestling, cares for his fans and acts as a good role model for them.
Plus he's a face and he gets booed; that's just plain pathetic, the way it is meant to work is that the faces get cheered and the heels get booed. But it's working a whole different way in this situation. Although you can hear a hoard of cheers from the crowd, you can sometimes still slightly even hear the boos, hell in some cases with Cena you could easily hear the boos, like these events for instance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-PkYVxM_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2PhzeLeI
But to keep John Cena's respect intact which he kinda deserves, I have wrote this:
John Cena because he is fun, funny, charismatic, a good brawler and powerhouse and knows how to get a crowd hyped up.
For all John Cena haters I have found a way to debunk all of your comments:
You all say these about John Cena:
1. His title reign was far too long and he gets too many title shots: Triple H, The Rock and JBL's title reigns went on for ages and I don't hear you complain about them. They also get (Except The Rock) loads of title shots and you seem to leave those superstars out when you criticise Cena. And it isn't like every match he gets is a main event, contender or title match.
2. His moveset is boring, he has a limited no. of moves and uses the same ones nearly every single match: Hey have you seen the people who use really simple moves like just punches and simple grapples like Mark Henry and Big Daddy V. Their movesets are hardly amusing, at least Cena puts some effort into his moves. Yet you fail to abuse them like you do to Cena. Plus John Cena is sometimes a mid carder with the jbl feud. In addition it is partly the trainers fault regarding Cena's moveset.
3. His marine gimmick is crap: Changing his gimmick is good because it gives the fans something new, although his previous gimmick attracted more older fans and I prefer it, the wwe company partly told him how to do his gimmick.
In addition, how can you say that he gets the hell booed out of him when he has a hell of a lot of hype going and probably the most merchandise going.
Also his mic skills and charisma are outstanding, after all that is what wwe mostly about! More than wrestling abilty I think!
I think Cena has:
-strength
-charisma
-technical skill
-mic skill
-popularity
-overall skill
People just want him to turn heel because they think he has been a good guy for far too long and his heel character appeals to older fans whereas his new one mostly appeals to younger fans.
But I still like him as my favourite wrestler, even though I would love it if he changed to his thuganomics gimmick again since I think it was better, more interesting and it appealed to my age more.
But nonetheless, I think he is a fantastic wrestler.
So if WWE reading this; please turn John Cena heel and back into the doctor of thuganomics for the sake of his fanbase, popularity and respect.
Thank you very much.
Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Okay, I'm in no way a Cena hater, but I dislike him as a wrestler.
Vince cares about $$$ and nothing more. Cena would be respected more as a heel by older fans, but does Vince care? No. He knows that less kids will buy a heel superstars merchandise, and therefore is not going to turn him heel until there's a decline in productivity.
I know Cena is a good guy outside of wrestling, that's why I respect him as a person. It doesn't mean I like him as a wrestler.
And yes, he's not getting more boos. It's pretty obvious that if a lot of fully grown men are booing, and little kids are cheering, then the booing is going to be a lot more audible. People have a right to free opinions, and if this is their opinion then fair enough. You can't force people into liking a certain wrestler, they either do or they don't.
This is what I have to say about your comments.
1) His title reign was far too long and he gets too many title shots.
Okay I'll start with JBL. He is one of the most disliked guys in the WWE, everybody dislikes him and everyone deals with that. Because everyone knows that JBL is a jerk, they don't bother posting Q's saying so. Cena on the other hand, has a very split audience. Many love him, many hate him. That's where the controversy comes from.
HHH is a good wrestler and entertaining on the mic. Cena is entertaining on the mic but he can't wrestle to the standard of HHH. And you have to remember HHH's great history with the WWE; his days with DX and so on. That is why he never gets insulted.
The Rock is possibly the most hilarious guy to ever step between the ropes. He had decent wrestling skills, but what was really amazing was the fact that he could have the whole crowd in stitches with the stuff he said on the mic.
2) His moveset is boring, he has a limited no. of moves and uses the same ones nearly every single match.
In response to your comments regarding BDV and Mark Henry, could you please inform me of people who actually like either of these guys? The only reason people talk about them less is because they aren't constantly main eventing like Cena. Say hypothetically, that BDV was main-eventing Raw. People would go beserk!
3) His marine gimmick is crap.
Changing the gimmick CAN be good, but it isn't always for the better; there have been failed gimmicks previously in WWE and this is just a classic example. At the time of Cena being heel, I think fans were quite content with him. His gimmick change really made the respect for him lower.
He gets the hell booed out of him because he isn't an able wrestler. Merchandise means nothing in terms of skill. The majority of people who buy his stuff are 13 and under, and many of them don't know a great deal about wrestling.
Yes, his mic skills are very good there's no denying that. But being good on the mic does not cover up wrestling flaws, of which Cena has many.
-strength. Yes he does, but so does the majority of the WWE roster. It doesn't make them more able as wrestlers.
-charisma. Yes he is very charismatic. But again, this doesn't make him more able.
-technical skill. No he doesn't. HBK, Chris Jericho and John Morrison have technical skill. John Cena will never be able to chain wrestle, mat wrestle, or put in any decent submission holds. Those are qualities of a technical wrestler.
-mic skill - Yes he does.
-popularity - Disputed. He has popularity from a certain area of WWE supporters, but many others don't like him. So for overall popularity, no.
-overall skill - Honestly no. Overall skill would be him dipping in and out of different types of wrestling; technical, submission, powerhouse, etc. Cena is a brawler with a few powerhouse moves. And nothing more.
I'm not trying to change your opinions, I'm just trying to be the voice of the haters. I can see their reasoning for disliking him.Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
i believe so and cause he is popular as a face and i think if WWE was smart they would send him to FCW and let him get somemore training doneIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
ur right, what batista said on moner day about people the over the age of 15 would love to see batista kick cenas a**, (batista kinda sucks 2 though lol) ....
Cena's wwe charactor will allways be the one who ruined the wwe 4 ever! But i respect him out of the wweIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
That's they only reason he still a face Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
duh even like last monday they said only little kids buy his stuffIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
pretty muchIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
pretty much you covered your own question lol
but it is true he shoves him right in our face's but vince has a new goal
and that is little kids.
i wonder what happened to the vince that treated everyone like goldenIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Those same kids get their parents to take them to House Shows, Live events and Pay Per Views. WWE looks at them as paying customers, can you blame them? I don't get worked up over John Cena like many other people seem to on Yahoo Answers. As a Wrestler, I can probably name several hundred wrestlers in ROH, FIP, AAA, CMLL, NJPW, PWH, Dragons Gate and other wrestling promotions who have more wrestling holds and moves. He cannot compare for example to Kenta, Brian Danielson, Nigel McGuinness, AJ Styles and Christopher Daniels. If all those older fans are going to go to House Shows, Live Events, Pay Per Views and buy John Cena Merchandise in the same quantities as the kids do, then maybe they will change his character. His Character being the way he is has gotten him commercials and endorsements. If you don't like him, who is to say you have to. This is a free country.Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
yer i think he is good face for the kids, but i think he would lose on sunday.Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
This money is and always will run by MONEY
Ofcourse Cena is being sold properly
He wont be turnin heel for a while
Vince wants the $MONEY$Is Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Cena's loved by both women and childrenIs Vince just keeping Cena face so that kids will buy his merchandise?
Yes! He sucks as a wrestler but he brings in the most money from merchandise so they keep him at the top. So this keeps people with good wrestling skills such as William Regal, Shelton Benjamin, Matt Hardy and Paul Burchill at the Low to Mid Card
Music how it effects your mood?
Hello eveyone! I am doing a project on how music effects one's mood. I am going to have youtube links to some songs, answer the questions, and get them to me via here, email, or aim i would love you forever! now this project ISNT on music prefrence so if you could just leave that behind for a little bit. i appoligize for some of the song can be long, but must people know the songs so that should help. if they are too long just listen to half of them, but try not to just pass by the song cause you dont think you will like it. i want if it changes your mood or any of the alike. thank you for your help and here are the questions:
Gender:
Age:
What is your mood right now (1-5)(1 being horriable):
What music do you listen to the most:
Are there any distractions that are going on right now:
Mood after listening to 1st song:
Mood after listening to 2nd song:
Mood after listening to 3rd song:
Mood after listening to 4th song:
Mood after listening to 5th song:
Mood after listening to 6th song:
Mood after listening to 7th song:
Mood after listening to 8th song:
Mood after listening to 9th song:
Mood after listening to 10th song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe-MIDDfc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2cFEHM9y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU2YK6eF1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=532jxGDRj
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27xt1XjzD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUmcUuPo3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlFZ2w0RV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzdeH6MaN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYq6bdJF4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt451wWEv
Well that is it there folks. I hope you enjoyed the music, not to mentation you are helping me out just by listening to music. The moods are on a scale of 1 to 5. Thanks again!Music how it effects your mood?
Yes, you know that it can only be a suggestive response:
The first one. It began really well. Then I saw the musician faces. And no that the faces were bad, but, their expressions are two serious, as if they were some incredible genius trying to convince us how good they are?Their playing was too polishing. So my mood : Vivaldi wrote the four season, and they played it only with their brains, mixing all season in one. Don檛 know what? Perhaps the Io one? Mood 1.5
The second is more sensible. The moon helps to escape, and the mood of the player and the composer blend to create something special, something that invite to see the light of the moon inside us. Yet, if we listen too longer, it檚 becoming too long, almost annoying because of the repetition. I think Beethoven would have played it differently.
In the scale of twenty, I would give fifteen. Mood 2
Country music, after both massacres listen previously, we can enjoy those spontaneous more simple expressions. I檓 now in a kind of festive mood. I would take my sexton, carbine, ride a horse and go to the south. Then, while the dusk comes, I would contemplate the moon and the music of the plain. Mood 2.5
The forth, I only watched the Ei Camino. It檚 a little too monotonous. But the blending with the sense of gravity and sounds, the mystery of human attempt against the matter can be an experiment. Everybody feels it differently, of course. Mood 3
The fifth is a kind of music I never listen, because I don檛 understand it. It檚 distressing, and even frightening. So I left it immediately. Mood 0
Next one: The art of power, taking the power on other thanks to a perfect hypnotic rhythmic. I hate it, not because of the music, but because they use music in order to catch people. The former was far less dangerous than this one. Mood 0
Hum! I never understood that one too! Why do people need to cry that sound. Perhaps they are so desperate, with nothing beautiful to sing, and they want to make some rhythmic noise. Don檛 know. Mood 1.5
8 Alarming, dark images, oppressive. Sorry, I can檛 listen to further. Mood 1
9) The beginning is imaginative. Yet what follows is very common. A blending of many things like that that he tries to make original. Deceptive. Mood 0.5
10) The rhythm is almost abstract. I think my computer must enjoy it much that I can. In thousand years from now, perhaps, it may have evolved to something that can be understood by some cybernetic processes. Mood 2.5 because my computer enjoyed it.
To sum up. Sorry! Those I could have enjoyed didn檛 reach my standard. Listen to Hilary Hann, for instance. She play divinely, yet she feels what she plays, and knows how to share it with you. I have the same feeling when I listen to Maria Jo茫o Pires, she may be less precise than Rubinstein, but she makes feel something.
As for modern music, I like some and other not. When I meet one I know, it often occurs by hazard. I discovered Michelle Branch like that.
I don檛 know if I helped.
Good luck.
Gender:
Age:
What is your mood right now (1-5)(1 being horriable):
What music do you listen to the most:
Are there any distractions that are going on right now:
Mood after listening to 1st song:
Mood after listening to 2nd song:
Mood after listening to 3rd song:
Mood after listening to 4th song:
Mood after listening to 5th song:
Mood after listening to 6th song:
Mood after listening to 7th song:
Mood after listening to 8th song:
Mood after listening to 9th song:
Mood after listening to 10th song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe-MIDDfc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2cFEHM9y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU2YK6eF1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=532jxGDRj
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27xt1XjzD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUmcUuPo3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlFZ2w0RV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzdeH6MaN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYq6bdJF4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt451wWEv
Well that is it there folks. I hope you enjoyed the music, not to mentation you are helping me out just by listening to music. The moods are on a scale of 1 to 5. Thanks again!Music how it effects your mood?
Yes, you know that it can only be a suggestive response:
The first one. It began really well. Then I saw the musician faces. And no that the faces were bad, but, their expressions are two serious, as if they were some incredible genius trying to convince us how good they are?Their playing was too polishing. So my mood : Vivaldi wrote the four season, and they played it only with their brains, mixing all season in one. Don檛 know what? Perhaps the Io one? Mood 1.5
The second is more sensible. The moon helps to escape, and the mood of the player and the composer blend to create something special, something that invite to see the light of the moon inside us. Yet, if we listen too longer, it檚 becoming too long, almost annoying because of the repetition. I think Beethoven would have played it differently.
In the scale of twenty, I would give fifteen. Mood 2
Country music, after both massacres listen previously, we can enjoy those spontaneous more simple expressions. I檓 now in a kind of festive mood. I would take my sexton, carbine, ride a horse and go to the south. Then, while the dusk comes, I would contemplate the moon and the music of the plain. Mood 2.5
The forth, I only watched the Ei Camino. It檚 a little too monotonous. But the blending with the sense of gravity and sounds, the mystery of human attempt against the matter can be an experiment. Everybody feels it differently, of course. Mood 3
The fifth is a kind of music I never listen, because I don檛 understand it. It檚 distressing, and even frightening. So I left it immediately. Mood 0
Next one: The art of power, taking the power on other thanks to a perfect hypnotic rhythmic. I hate it, not because of the music, but because they use music in order to catch people. The former was far less dangerous than this one. Mood 0
Hum! I never understood that one too! Why do people need to cry that sound. Perhaps they are so desperate, with nothing beautiful to sing, and they want to make some rhythmic noise. Don檛 know. Mood 1.5
8 Alarming, dark images, oppressive. Sorry, I can檛 listen to further. Mood 1
9) The beginning is imaginative. Yet what follows is very common. A blending of many things like that that he tries to make original. Deceptive. Mood 0.5
10) The rhythm is almost abstract. I think my computer must enjoy it much that I can. In thousand years from now, perhaps, it may have evolved to something that can be understood by some cybernetic processes. Mood 2.5 because my computer enjoyed it.
To sum up. Sorry! Those I could have enjoyed didn檛 reach my standard. Listen to Hilary Hann, for instance. She play divinely, yet she feels what she plays, and knows how to share it with you. I have the same feeling when I listen to Maria Jo茫o Pires, she may be less precise than Rubinstein, but she makes feel something.
As for modern music, I like some and other not. When I meet one I know, it often occurs by hazard. I discovered Michelle Branch like that.
I don檛 know if I helped.
Good luck.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)